Purpose
The APC is a competency-based assessment. Candidates must demonstrate that they have achieved the required level of attainment in each of their selected competencies — mandatory, core and optional — through a combination of recorded experience, a written summary and oral examination. The quality of competency evidence is the single most important factor in determining APC success.
This guidance note explains how competency evidence should be built, recorded and presented for the QS and Construction pathway. It covers the three levels of attainment, the diary and summary of experience, and how to structure evidence that satisfies assessors at each level.
The guidance draws from the APC Candidate Guide (June 2025, amended March 2026) and the QS and Construction Pathway Guide (December 2025, Version 1.1), which provides detailed examples of activities at each competency level.
Key Principles
• Competency levels are progressive and must be achieved in order: Level 1 (knowledge and understanding) → Level 2 (application of knowledge) → Level 3 (reasoned advice and depth of knowledge).
• The QS and Construction pathway requires: Ethics, Rules of Conduct and professionalism to Level 3; Client care, Communication and negotiation and Health and safety to Level 2; the remaining seven mandatory competencies to Level 1; all six technical core competencies to Level 3 — Commercial management (of construction works) or Design economics and cost planning, Construction technology and environmental services, Contract practice, Procurement and tendering, Project finance (control and reporting), and Quantification and costing (of construction works); and two technical optional competencies to Level 2 (RICS Quantity Surveying and Construction Pathway Guide, December 2025, section 3). Note that every core competency on this pathway is assessed at Level 3, so reasoned advice — not just practical application — must be evidenced for each of the six.
• Level 1 evidence can draw on formal education (including your degree), training courses, CPD activities and workplace learning. It should demonstrate what you know and understand.
• Level 2 evidence must demonstrate practical application — what you have done, on which projects, for which clients, and what your personal role was. On this pathway Level 2 is a staging post for the core competencies rather than the finishing line: it must be reached, but Level 3 is the assessed requirement. Specific examples with project context are essential.
• Level 3 evidence must show you have given reasoned professional advice with financial or strategic implications for the client. The advice should be predominantly your individual responsibility, not collective.
• The summary of experience is limited to 2,000 words per competency (at Levels 2 and 3). Quality and specificity matter more than volume.
• The APC diary is your primary evidence-gathering tool — record experience contemporaneously, not retrospectively.
Practical Application
Common Mistakes to Avoid
• Writing in generalities — 'I have experience in cost planning' is meaningless. Specify the project, your role, the methodology and the outcome.
• Claiming team achievements as personal evidence — assessors will probe the distinction between your individual contribution and the team's collective work. Be honest about your specific role.
• Confusing Level 2 and Level 3 — Level 2 is doing the work; Level 3 is advising on the work. Preparing a cost plan is Level 2; advising the client on budget strategy based on your cost plan analysis is Level 3.
• Neglecting mandatory competencies — although mandatory competencies are assessed to lower levels, candidates frequently underperform on these because they assume the questions will be easy.
• Not using the pathway guide examples — the QS and Construction Pathway Guide provides detailed examples of activities at each level for every competency. These are the benchmarks assessors use.
• Backfilling the diary before submission — assessors can identify retrospective entries. Contemporaneous recording produces richer, more credible evidence.
APC Competency & Quick Reference
• QS Pathway — Level 3 required: Ethics, Rules of Conduct and professionalism, plus all six technical core competencies
• QS Pathway — Level 2 required: Client care, Communication and negotiation and Health and safety, plus the two technical optional competencies
• QS Pathway — Level 1 required: the remaining seven mandatory competencies (accounting principles and procedures, business planning, conflict avoidance, data management, diversity, inclusion and teamworking, inclusive environments, sustainability)
• Summary of experience: max 2,000 words per competency at Levels 2 and 3
• Structured training: min 400 days (24-month route) or 200 days (12-month route)
APC Preparation Checklist
CPD Learning Outcomes
• Distinguish between Level 1 (knowledge), Level 2 (application) and Level 3 (reasoned advice) competency evidence using specific QS pathway examples.
• Structure a summary of experience using appropriate frameworks to present clear, specific and credible evidence of competence.
• Plan a structured approach to building and recording competency evidence across all mandatory, core and optional competencies over the APC training period.
Further Reading
• RICS, APC Candidate Guide (June 2025, amended March 2026) — https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/apc
• RICS, Quantity Surveying and Construction Pathway Guide (December 2025, Version 1.1) — https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/apc
• RICS, Requirements and Competencies Guide (December 2025, amended March 2026) — https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/apc
• RICS, APC Diary Template — available via RICS assessment platform
• RICS, Self-Assessment Form (QS and Construction pathway) — available via RICS assessment platform
Sections 3–8 are for subscribers
Your subscription unlocks Practical Application steps, Common Mistakes to Avoid, APC Quick Reference, the Stage Checklist, CPD Learning Outcomes, Further Reading, and all production-ready templates.