Purpose
Post-tender clarifications are the formal process by which the QS resolves ambiguities, qualifications and arithmetic errors in the tender returns of the preferred tenderer before the tender report is finalised. Clarifications must be strictly limited to matters of interpretation and omission — the tender price itself cannot be renegotiated through the clarification process unless the Instructions to Tenderers expressly permitted best-and-final-offer (BAFO) submissions or post-tender negotiation.
Negotiation is a distinct process from clarification and should be used sparingly and with clear client authority. Where the preferred tender exceeds the approved budget, the QS may be instructed to negotiate a cost reduction — typically through scope reduction, specification value engineering, or the removal of provisional sums. Any reduction achieved through negotiation must be documented in a formal post-tender negotiation schedule that forms part of the contract documentation.
RICS Tendering Strategies (2015) confirms that post-tender negotiation on price is permissible in limited circumstances but must be conducted transparently and with a complete audit trail. For public sector projects under the Procurement Act 2023, negotiation after tender submission is not available under the open procedure; it is permissible only within a competitive flexible procedure, and only where the tender notice and associated tender documents provide for it.
Key Principles
- RICS Tendering Strategies (1st edition, 2015), Section 3.11 — Post-Tender Interviews, Section 3.13 — Post Tender, Section 4.3 — Managing and Reporting: governs the scope and conduct of post-tender clarifications and negotiations.
- JCT Tendering Practice Note (2012): confirms that the preferred tenderer should be given the opportunity to clarify, but not to fundamentally alter, the basis of their tender before contract execution.
- Procurement Act 2023, s.20(2): the Act provides two competitive tendering procedures — the open procedure (s.20(2)(a)), a single-stage procedure that does not permit post-submission negotiation, and the competitive flexible procedure (s.20(2)(b)), which the authority may design to include negotiation or dialogue stages. The restricted procedure, competitive dialogue and competitive procedure with negotiation no longer exist as named procedures; all three are now achieved, where justified, within the competitive flexible procedure.
- RICS Appropriate Contract Selection (2nd edition, 2024): design-checking periods between tender return and contract signing provide an opportunity to address post-tender design development — any changes discovered during this period that affect the contract price must be managed through agreed variation procedures.
- Competition Act 1998: post-tender discussions must not involve sharing information about other tenderers' prices or positions; doing so could constitute anti-competitive behaviour.
Practical Application
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Using the clarification process to renegotiate price — clarifications are for resolving genuine ambiguities, not for extracting a discount. Disguising price negotiation as 'clarification' is improper and may constitute a breach of tender obligations.
- Disclosing the approved budget to the preferred tenderer during negotiations — this gives the tenderer the information to price to the budget ceiling rather than to market value.
- Conducting negotiations without a client representative present — the client must be party to all negotiation meetings; negotiating on the client's behalf without authority and without their knowledge creates professional liability risk.
- Not documenting negotiated adjustments in a formal schedule — verbal agreements about price reductions have no contractual force; every negotiated change must be in writing and signed by both parties.
- For public sector clients: conducting post-tender price negotiation under the open procedure, or under a competitive flexible procedure that did not provide for negotiation — this may render the contract award unlawful under the Procurement Act 2023.
- Negotiating the contractor down to an unviable pricing position — the QS's duty is to secure value for the client, not to force the contractor into a loss-making position. A tenderer who cannot sustain the pricing will become a delivery risk; negotiate for genuine value, not the lowest possible number.
APC Competency & Quick Reference
APC Competencies: Procurement & Tendering (L2) | Cost Management (L2) | Legal & Regulatory Compliance (L1) | Commercial Management (L2)
Clarifications & Negotiations Checklist
CPD Learning Outcomes
- Distinguish between post-tender clarification (resolving ambiguities) and post-tender negotiation (seeking price revision), and apply each process within the limits permitted by RICS Tendering Strategies (2015) and the applicable procurement procedure.
- Prepare a post-tender clarification schedule and a post-tender negotiation schedule, ensuring all agreed changes are documented in writing and form part of the contract documentation.
- Identify when post-tender negotiation is not available under the Procurement Act 2023, and advise public sector clients on the procurement procedures that permit structured negotiation.
Further Reading
- RICS Tendering Strategies (1st edition, 2015, RICS Books) — Sections 3.11, 3.13, 4.3
- JCT Tendering Practice Note (2012, Sweet & Maxwell)
- RICS Appropriate Contract Selection (2nd edition, 2024, RICS) — Section 4.6
- Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (SI 2015/102, HMSO) — regulations 27–30, for procurements commenced before 24 February 2025
- Procurement Act 2023 (c.54, HMSO) — s.20 (competitive tendering procedures)
- Competition Act 1998 (c.41, HMSO)
Sections 3–8 are for subscribers
Your subscription unlocks Practical Application steps, Common Mistakes to Avoid, APC Quick Reference, the Stage Checklist, CPD Learning Outcomes, Further Reading, and all production-ready templates.