Purpose
Stage 8 — Dispute & Claims — covers the QS's role in managing, preparing, assessing, and resolving construction contract disputes and claims. While dispute and claims work can arise at any stage of the project, this stage addresses the dedicated knowledge, processes, and professional obligations required when a dispute escalates beyond normal commercial negotiation — requiring formal claim preparation, expert analysis, adjudication, arbitration, or litigation support.
RICS Conflict Avoidance and Dispute Resolution in Construction (1st ed., April 2012, reissued August 2024) establishes the minimum level of service that every chartered surveyor must provide in respect of conflict avoidance and dispute resolution: proactively managing potential disputes, recognising escalation, keeping clients informed, and understanding the available resolution mechanisms. The QS's first obligation is to avoid disputes; the second is to resolve them at the lowest possible cost; the third is to manage them professionally when resolution is not possible.
The HGCRA 1996 (as amended 2009) underpins the entire statutory adjudication framework in England & Wales — any party to a construction contract has the right to refer a dispute to adjudication at any time. The QS must understand this right, the procedural requirements, the tight timescales, and the consequences of failure to respond effectively. Dispute & Claims work is technically demanding and professionally sensitive — errors of commission (unsupported claims) and errors of omission (missed evidence) can cost clients very significant sums.
Key Principles
- RICS Conflict Avoidance and Dispute Resolution in Construction (1st ed., April 2012): proactive management, good documentation, early warning of disputes, and understanding the dispute resolution landscape — negotiation, mediation, adjudication, arbitration, litigation.
- HGCRA 1996 (as amended 2009), Section 108: any party to a construction contract has the right to refer any dispute to adjudication at any time; the adjudicator has 28 days to decide from referral (or 42 days with referring party's consent); the decision is immediately binding.
- RICS Damages for Delay to Completion (2nd ed., April 2024): liquidated damages are a genuine pre-estimate of loss and must be supported by a documented calculation; unliquidated damages require proof of actual loss.
- RICS Ascertaining Loss and Expense (2nd ed., July 2024): the methodology for quantifying prolongation and disruption claims; Emden/Hudson formulae for head office overhead; time-based vs resource-based approaches.
- Arbitration Act 1996: governs arbitration proceedings in England & Wales; the arbitrator's award is final and binding (subject to limited statutory appeal rights); arbitration is private, unlike litigation.
- Professional obligations: RICS Rules of Conduct require chartered surveyors acting as expert witnesses to provide independent, objective evidence; RICS Expert Witness PS (2nd ed., effective 2 January 2018) sets the mandatory standards.
Practical Application
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Failing to keep contemporaneous records throughout the project — records are the foundation of every dispute; a QS who cannot produce contemporaneous evidence to support a claim position is professionally and commercially vulnerable.
- Missing HGCRA/contractual procedural requirements — an adjudication commenced without a valid Notice of Adjudication, or with a Referral Notice served out of time, can be jurisdictionally challenged.
- Attempting to conduct adjudication proceedings without specialist legal/dispute resolution support on high-value or legally complex disputes — the QS's role is quantum and commercial; legal analysis should involve the client's solicitors.
- Acting as expert witness and advocate on the same matter — these are mutually exclusive roles; the RICS Expert Witness PS prohibits an expert from acting as an advocate.
- Failing to advise clients of the adjudication timetable — adjudication runs to very tight timescales (28 days from referral); the QS must ensure the client understands the urgency and resource commitment required.
APC Competency & Quick Reference
- Conflict Avoidance, Management and Dispute Resolution Procedures Level 3 — adjudication, arbitration, expert evidence, claim preparation
- Contract Practice Level 3 — contractual dispute resolution procedures, HGCRA, JCT/NEC dispute provisions
Dispute & Claims Checklist
CPD Learning Outcomes
- Apply the RICS Conflict Avoidance and Dispute Resolution framework to proactively manage potential disputes, recognise escalation, and advise clients on the appropriate resolution mechanism for each type of dispute.
- Manage the procedural requirements of statutory adjudication under HGCRA 1996 — Notice of Adjudication, Referral Notice, Response, timetables — and prepare or review quantum sections of claim documents.
- Distinguish between liquidated and unliquidated damages in construction contracts and advise clients on the conditions for deduction and the evidential requirements for each.
Further Reading
- RICS, Conflict Avoidance and Dispute Resolution in Construction, 1st edition, April 2012 (reissued August 2024)
- RICS, Damages for Delay to Completion, 2nd edition, April 2024
- RICS, Ascertaining Loss and Expense, 2nd edition, July 2024
- Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (as amended by Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009)
- Arbitration Act 1996
- RICS Expert Witness PS, 2nd edition, effective 2 January 2018
Sections 3–8 are for subscribers
Your subscription unlocks Practical Application steps, Common Mistakes to Avoid, APC Quick Reference, the Stage Checklist, CPD Learning Outcomes, Further Reading, and all production-ready templates.